Monthly Archive for February, 2008

Different Honeymoon

A couple of nights ago, my friend’s friend (Julie) received a random unsolicited email from combinedtours@trips-southamerica.com. Upon opening the message, she saw the following embedded advertisement:

As you can imagine, Julie was very surprised to see a couple of faces she recognized in the image! As was Kara, to whom Julie forwarded the message, and as was I when Kara in turn forwarded it along to me. I was as shocked as she was that Kenny and I were serving as models for a South American travel agency that we had never heard of. But even more baffling was the fact that this random image in a SPAM email from a totally obscure company, who apparently filched my image from Flickr but has no idea who I am, actually made its way back to me.

On another amusing note, the travel package described in the advertisement above includes a trip to the Brazilian side of Iguazu, which offers a panoramic view of the Cataratas, but nothing like the up close and personal experience shown in the photo, which was taken in Argentina.

Yellow and Red

I ended up spending my photography day two Sundays ago at the Volunteer Park Conservatory, UW campus, and the main branch of the Seattle Public Library. I had a great time at the Conservatory (aside from the one room where my lens kept fogging up), an okay time at UW (I really don’t know my way around campus, and I had to run back to my car early because my camera battery died), and an absolute blast at the library.

The library is obviously wonderful because of its unique amorphous exterior, the shapes formed by its blue metallic frame and panes of glass, and the views of the city that it offers. But I had the most fun playing with the bright colors of the red stairs and electric yellow escalators.

DSC_0455

DSC_0433

DSC_0377

DSC_0414

Nader

It’s hard not to hate the guy (unless you’re a Republican). He’s an egomaniac who shows no apparent shame about popularizing the myth that there was little difference between Gore and Bush back in 2000, or about splitting the Democratic vote to make that year’s election tip ever so slightly towards Bush.

In fact, his attitude about this year’s election seems rather similar to the one he held eight years ago:

“I think it always would probably pull votes away from the Democrats and not the Republicans, so naturally, Republicans would welcome his entry into the race,” Huckabee said Sunday on CNN.

But Nader — citing the Republican Party’s economic policies, the Iraq war, and other issues — told NBC, “If the Democrats can’t landslide the Republicans this year, they ought to just wrap up, close down, emerge in a different form.”

If Mr. Nader is truly confident that the Democrats will pull off a landslide given the favorable political climate, all I can say is that he’s seriously underestimating the Democratic Party’s ability to completely f— things up. Unless he’s simply trying to prove that it is time for the Democratic Party to take some time off and seriously reevaluate itself. Or unless his uber-point is that he doesn’t care who wins this election, because Democrats and Republicans are still all the same to him.

I just hope that he gets seriously destroyed this time around and the experience discourages him from ever running for office again.

Words of Wisdom

From my husband:

Dude! Getting drunk with friends on a weeknight – it’s good shit.

Photogenic Seattle

I’m taking an “Introduction to SLR Photography Class,” and my assignment for this week is to take photos of scenes containing interesting geometric shapes. The assignment can be interpreted loosely — e.g., a pine tree can be a triangle, and the geometric shape in the photo may exist only because I’ve cut off the edges of an object in the way I’ve framed a shot. I kind of copped out on my last assignment because I was so busy and out of town for a few weekends in a row — I ended up finishing my assignment by taking photos around Microsoft campus during my lunch break. As you might expect, they weren’t very interesting.

This time around, I have all day Sunday free and I want to go do some shooting in various parts of Seattle. Here are some thoughts on places to go (mostly very obvious spots):

Any other ideas?

Super Wednesday

As we all know, today is Super Tuesday, and the results are starting to roll in.

What you may not know is that tomorrow is Super Wednesday: the day that Karaoke Revolution will be released for the Wii.

I have mine on pre-order. Do you?

Caucus Confusion

I spoke to quite a few friends this weekend who are registered Democrats in Washington state and who would like to cast votes for the Democratic presidential nomination. A few of them had already received their absentee ballots for the primary and were planning to send them in. They were shocked when I told them that the Washington State Democratic primary does not count.

Given the mixed messages that abound, how were they to know? I scoured my absentee ballot and it contained no mention of the fact that the primary is simply a beauty contest and its results will not be used for anything. Sam Reed, Washington’s Secretary of State, has an FAQ (PDF) that contains quite a bit of commentary on why political participation is important, Washington is the second-largest state in the west, the caucus system disenfranchises many voters, having a primary helps us get attention from the various campaigns that would otherwise pass us over, etc. Finally, the FAQ gets to the most important question (emphasis mine):

Q: How will the political parties use the results of the Presidential Primary?

Political parties retain the authority to decide if they will use the Presidential Primary to allocate delegates to the national nominating conventions. The political parties may also use caucus results, or a combination of primary results and caucus results.

The Republican Party used the results of the primary to allocate all of the Washington delegates in 1992, half of its delegates in 1996, and one third of its delegates in 2000. The State Republican Party has decided that it will use the 2008 Presidential Primary to allocate 51% of its delegates. The remaining 49% of the delegates will be allocated based on caucus results.

The Democratic Party has never used the results of the primary to allocate delegates. The State Democratic Party will only use caucuses to allocate delegates in 2008.

You’d think that this note would merit a bit more attention, rather than two sentences buried in a FAQ on a website that I’d imagine gets very little traffic.

The Washington State Democratic Party makes this a bit clearer, by warning voters about it on the front page of their website and pointing to the relevant part of their own FAQ:

Why is Washington State having Caucuses and a Primary? The Washington State Legislature was the body who voted to hold a primary. The means that the Washington State Democratic Party, which chooses how delegates are decided, had no participation in the decision to hold the primary, which will cost $9 to $10 million. The Washington State Democratic Party decided to choose their delegates through the Caucuses, as it always has. As a result, your vote for a Democratic candidate in the State Primary will not count toward delegate selection.

But again, I assume that an infinitesimal number of voters who want to place a vote in the primary even know that this site exists.

I’m not sure how I feel about the caucus system (February 9 will be my first caucus experience), and my gut feeling is that a primary with an absentee option would make it vastly easier for voters to participate.

But for now, this is what we have; so please help spread the word that:

  • The Democratic primary does not count.
  • Only results from the February 9 caucuses will be used to allocate delegates for the Democratic nomination.
  • You can find out your caucus location here.